It’s not what you’ve got; it’s how you use it when it comes to Process Automation
Understanding the difference between Process Automation and Business Re-Engineering is key when deploying new technology. Never more so than with AI implementations.
Many organizations have turned to process automation as a quick fix, thinking that simply applying technology to existing workflows will result in improved efficiency. However, true transformation goes beyond automation, it lies in the core of business process re-engineering (BPR).
BPR is about rethinking and radically redesigning business processes from the ground up to achieve dramatic improvements. It’s not simply about applying a technology solution to an existing process; it’s about understanding the value layer - how business processes add value to the organization and its customers and ensuring that technology enhances this value rather than just automating what already exists.
One of the critical components of business process re-engineering is embracing tools that CREATE. These are models that have analyzed enough data and recognized patterns to generate new content when prompted. In the context of BPR, this could mean designing new workflows or processes that were previously impossible or unconsidered. Instead of automating existing practices, tools that create can help reimagine what is possible by suggesting new processes, organizational structures, or approaches to customer interaction that maximize value.
For example, in a customer service process, AI models could analyze past customer interactions and suggest entirely new ways to engage customers, creating content or solutions tailored to each individual, thus transforming the customer experience.
Another powerful aspect of re-engineering business processes is the use of tools that LEARN. These are models that evolve and improve as more data is consumed, providing predictive insights and "what-if" type outcomes. In process re-engineering, learning models help organizations not only improve their current processes but predict future trends and potential disruptions.
For instance, in supply chain management, learning models can anticipate demand spikes or shortages, allowing the business to proactively adjust operations, reducing waste and optimizing resources. This capability moves beyond automation by providing dynamic decision-making and ensuring that processes evolve in real time to meet business needs.
At the heart of process re-engineering is the need for systems that don’t just carry out tasks but think. Tools that THINK automate complex tasks based on rigorous business logic. These systems optimize workflows by incorporating decision-making capabilities that increase operational efficiency and ensure consistent, high-quality outputs.
For example, in a financial services firm, tools that think could automate risk assessments based on a set of business rules, ensuring that each customer is evaluated consistently and accurately without requiring manual intervention. These systems do not just carry out rote tasks, they make decisions that improve overall efficiency.
Of course, no conversation about business process re-engineering would be complete without acknowledging tools that DO. These are the systems that automate repetitive manual tasks, freeing up human resources to focus on higher-value activities. Whether it’s data entry, scheduling, or routine customer service tasks, tools that ’do’ remove the tedium from daily operations, allowing teams to direct their attention to areas that require strategic thinking or creativity.
In the context of BPR, tools that do are critical in creating the operational bandwidth necessary for transformation. They provide the foundation on which more strategic process re-engineering can be built by automating lower-value tasks and improving speed and accuracy.
The key to business process re-engineering is rethinking the process entirely. Rather than simply automating existing workflows, BPR requires asking deeper questions:
For example, let’s consider the classic example of a customer service process. Rather than merely automating call center operations with AI chatbots, BPR would involve analyzing the entire customer journey from initial inquiry to resolution and reimagining how the company could deliver the most value at every touchpoint. It might involve eliminating steps, consolidating roles, or even redefining the way the company interacts with customers.
Through this lens, process re-engineering doesn’t just automate or streamline existing activities; it creates entirely new ways of achieving business objectives. In this scenario, technology is an enabler used strategically to support the re-engineered process, not the driver of change.
A crucial point to understand when thinking about process re-engineering is that technology is a tool, not a solution. Too often, companies rush to implement the latest technology, thinking it will solve their problems. But without a strategic understanding of what the process needs to achieve, technology can be just another layer on top of an already inefficient system.
For example, a company might invest in a new CRM system to automate sales and customer support processes. However, without understanding the current challenges, the new system may only exacerbate existing inefficiencies or create additional complexity. In contrast, a well-xecuted re-engineering effort would first focus on identifying bottlenecks, redundant tasks, and strategic objectives before selecting the appropriate technology that best supports the redesigned process.
In a true business process re-engineering effort, technology is introduced only after the business goals and process inefficiencies have been clearly defined. This ensures that technology serves the purpose of the re-engineered process and doesn’t dictate the terms of the change.
Business process re-engineering often involves multiple departments and stakeholders. Re-engineering a process that touches on various aspects of the business requires cross-functional collaboration. It’s not just the responsibility of one department (e.g., IT or Operations) but a shared responsibility across teams. Everyone from finance to customer service, HR, and IT must be involved to ensure the redesigned process works smoothly for all departments and meets business goals.
In many cases, BPR also requires shifting the organizational mindset. It may involve breaking down silos, encouraging innovation, and fostering a culture where processes are regularly evaluated and optimized.
Re-engineering processes is not a one-time event but a continuous cycle. Once a process is redesigned, businesses need to measure the outcomes, collect feedback, and look for further opportunities to refine and improve. This continuous improvement mindset ensures that processes remain relevant, efficient, and aligned with the organization’s evolving strategic goals.
In many ways, business process re-engineering is about building the foundation for ongoing innovation, not a singular fix. It’s about setting up systems and frameworks that encourage agility, adaptation, and the ability to respond to changes in the market, technology, or customer preferences.
Ultimately, the essence of business process re-engineering is about rethinking the way business is done—not just automating what already exists. It’s about identifying the value that processes deliver, challenging traditional ways of working, and finding innovative ways to achieve strategic goals.
Technology will undoubtedly play a role in enhancing or enabling the re-engineered processes, but it’s secondary to understanding why a process needs to change and how it will add value to the business. By focusing on the value layer first and using technology strategically to support re-imagined processes, businesses can unlock true operational transformation and create sustainable long-term success.
Keeping up with today’s fast-moving business world is tough—especially when it feels like your technology initiatives aren't keeping pace. Misaligned strategies, disconnected teams, and systems that don’t talk to each other can leave stakeholders and employees frustrated and wondering what’s next.
That’s where our Technology Enablement Framework comes in. It’s a straightforward, practical approach that helps organizations keep moving. Make the most of your technology investments and gear up to continue building a future-ready operation!
If you’re going to implement a technology enablement project, here are some things to consider:
Jabian provides value-focused solutions designed to enhance the competitiveness and profitability of its clients as they seek to expand, enhance, or evolve their businesses.
Their consulting approach is rooted in a commitment to building deep, enduring client relationships, with a strong emphasis on serving local markets and delivering solutions tailored to each organization’s unique needs. Guided by a holistic methodology that integrates strategy, technology enablement, and change management, Jabian delivers practical, customized solutions with measurable impact.
Recognizing that sustainable success requires a balance of agility and long-term vision, Jabian specializes in cost-effective, scalable strategies tailored to the needs of mid-market companies.
With a steadfast dedication to community engagement and client-centric service, Jabian positions itself as more than just a consultancy. It serves as a trusted partner, helping organizations unlock value, streamline operations, and achieve meaningful growth.
Avalanche vs. Snowball Effects
Complexities of AI Adoption in the Workplace.
Contradictions and complexities of using AI in the workplace.
How AI Can Unlock The Narrative.
Ensuring Alignment with Organizational Objectives.
The Future of Work and Workforce Transformation
The Power of a Culture Ready for Change.
6 Key Cultural Behaviors.
Challenges when Tools are Prioritized over Culture.
Turning Investment into Impact
Aligning Strategy, People, and Processes for Lasting Success
Let us know what you think about the article.